Support for the T-Home MR 300

Viewing 2 posts - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #2896
    Mischa
    Guest

    Hi all,

    I am owning a HP MediaVault 2120 with a pre-Installed Firefly DLNA-Server. For the use with ordinary PC’s it does a great job but in combination with my new Media Receiver 300 (The IPTC streaming client from T-Home) it doesn’t work.

    The problem is the MR 300 and the client software called “Medien-Beta”. The only kind of streaming server recognized us a Windows Media Player 11, nothing else works, even no simple samba shares.

    So here my question:
    Is there a more current version of Firefly which behaves like a Windows Media Player 11 from client point of view? If not is this a already a sceduled feature?

    PS:
    I visited the Firefly Wiki, it looked like a dry desert, the main-page was last updated in the year 2006. Is the Firefly-community still activ?

    Thanks in advanced,
    Mischa

    #18517
    stretch
    Participant

    @Mischa wrote:

    I am owning a HP MediaVault 2120 with a pre-Installed Firefly DLNA-Server. For the use with ordinary PC’s it does a great job but in combination with my new Media Receiver 300 (The IPTC streaming client from T-Home) it doesn’t work.

    Firefly is a DAAP server, DLNA is based on UPnP. Firefly is not a DLNA compliant server.

    @Mischa wrote:

    The problem is the MR 300 and the client software called “Medien-Beta”. The only kind of streaming server recognized us a Windows Media Player 11, nothing else works, even no simple samba shares.

    WMP uses UPnP

    @Mischa wrote:

    Is there a more current version of Firefly which behaves like a Windows Media Player 11 from client point of view? If not is this a already a sceduled feature?

    UPnP was in the process of being added to Firefly but implementation is not complete.

    @Mischa wrote:

    I visited the Firefly Wiki, it looked like a dry desert, the main-page was last updated in the year 2006. Is the Firefly-community still activ?

    The community is still active but there is no ongoing development work.
    The sole developer either doesn’t have the time or lost interest with the project.

Viewing 2 posts - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)
  • The forum ‘Feature Requests’ is closed to new topics and replies.