Reply To: Feedback on svn-1348

#5953
rpedde
Participant

@grommet wrote:

Ron, I haven’t had time to beat on it, yet… but so far, with only 2 attempts, something is slower in svn-1359:

2006-08-20 17:46:33 (f3f11f6d): Scanned 20814 songs in 505 seconds
2006-08-20 17:46:33 (f3f11f6d): Serving 20814 songs. Startup complete in 505 seconds

Now, not that dreadful 40 minutes we had before… but slower than the svn-1344 record benchmarks I had at the beginning of this thread.

That’s peculiar. I know what changed there, but not why it should change the scan speed. I thought I had saw that, but then wasn’t sure.

Oh yeah, and Sample Rate and Size is still missing from WMA. 8)

Argh!!!